On Del Bigtree's show, The Highwire, it was noted that in the case of Hannah Poling, the government ruled vaccines caused her regressive autism. She has a mitochondrial disorder and after being vaccinated she regressed into autism. Shortly after her case, the head of the CDC did an interview which you can watch below, in which she admits that children with mitochondrial disorders can regress into autism after vaccination.
It was also noted on The Highwire, that since Hannah Poling's case, 1,000,000 children have been diagnosed with autism. My question, and I hope everyone else's question, is why the CDC has done nothing since 2009, when the director flat out stated on national television that there is a known subgroup of babies/toddlers who will potentially regress into autism following vaccination? From my studies there are many, many KNOWN factors that are involved in a baby being born autistic or regressing into autism. Vaccination is not the only 'cause'. It's more like a 'final straw' for some children. Having certain gene mutations, like the MTHFR, can contribute to determining if a child will be predisposed to autism. Since science knows this, why has nothing been done? It's 2018 for goodness sake. How many of those 1,000,000 children could have been spared? Was it worth the risk for those families?
It seems to me that if the government really cared, they could easily add something like the blood test at birth to check babies out. Except that, it would mess up their schedule. Because most babies are given Hepatitis B vaccination just hours after they are born. In fact, the majority of vaccinations are given to people who can't talk, express their feelings, or even show their feelings well. No one knows just how their two month old is reacting to the vaccines because THEY CAN'T TALK. And it's safer that way (for those in charge, not for the infant.)
Just last year in vaccine court, a case of SIDS went through. Vaccines were a clear cut precursor to this specific SIDS case. Again, the question begs, if it happened to one baby, how many more did it happen to? How many of the 3,600 babies that died in 2016 were the result of a bad vaccine reaction? How many in the past 40 or 50 years? Was it worth the risk for those families?
It really wows me that anyone can easily look up vaccine adverse reaction payouts from the government (including entire details of each case), visit VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) and limit searches to "did not recover" "death" etc., and still not admit that vaccines CAN cause autism, CAN cause SIDS, and CAN cause all sorts of really serious suffering for more than a few children across America. No, not all vaccines kill, maim, or otherwise. Lots of children turned out just fine. But was it worth the risk for the parents who either literally or figuratively lost their children after that fateful vaccination? Each one of those parents will say no. Unaffected parents will say yes.
Unaffected parents are worried about measles, whooping cough, rotavirus, and pneumonia and meningitis. Affected parents either don't have a child, or have a child who is continually sick for the rest of their life. There seems to be a disconnect and I don't really understand the lack of empathy for fellow mankind. What ALL parents ought to do is asses their child's risk for individual diseases and their risk for adverse events from the vaccines. This is what I did before we had children, and I think it was a very eye opening journey about RISK.
If you knew your child had a chance of dying or suffering after a round of shots, would parents take their children to the doctor so trustingly? No, of course not. Parents have built in risk assessors, they automatically know what is safest for their children. But vaccines are tricky. Because the concept is great, but the reality is terrible.
This is going long, and, forgive me, but there is just a little more to say. Back in the 80's when I grew up, children were dying and becoming vegetables from the DTP vaccine. So they changed it because the vaccine companies were getting their pants sued off. Their new vaccine was weaker, but it didn't kill or maim so many children and that was a good thing for everyone. However, in 1986, vaccine companies became 100% totally free from liability. President Reagan signed into law the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act which created a special court, special lawyers, and a special fund (created by taxing vaccines) to pay off vaccine injured people. Now, instead of just ANYONE going to court to get money from the vaccine companies, people had to put in a special request. If you were denied, that was the end of the road. No justice, no refund, end of story. If your request was accepted, the vaccine court heard arguments from both sides and made it REALLY hard to win your case. Very few people have been recompensed for their losses by the US government and it really is sad.
Also what happened in 1986 was recklessness, greed, and power. The vaccine companies were free from lawsuits, so no matter what vaccine they created, they were safe. And boy did they ever create those vaccines. Look at the comparison:
Do you happen to see the same explosion I do? I am extremely thankful I was born in 1982, let me tell you that. Immune stimulating events, especially at very young ages, can REALLY mess up babies. It's in the science literature about T1 and T2 responses, look it up in pubmed. And there is an immune stimulating event at birth, 2 months (8 immune stimulating events actually, because there are eight separate viruses or killed viruses or partial viruses etc. entering that bitty baby's body) 4 months, 6 months, etc. Half the list is given to babies by age one. It's absurd. My one year old has had 2 fevers in her life. Two really 'serious' immune stimulating events. If she was up to date on her vaccinations, she would have had 33 immune stimulating events. To me that just seems way too much for any baby.
I read that one of J.B. Handley's recommendations in his book, How to End the Autism Epidemic, is to go back to the 1980's vaccine schedule. He has more recommendations, I am very interested to read about them. But that one idea alone, to just stop the clock and go back to what we know is safer, strikes a very good chord with me. I really do expect to learn quite a bit from his book. And I REALLY hope his message is read loud and clear by the American public. We need to make a change for the future of our children.
If you don't think this is important, think about it this way. In the U.S., there are 6,000 babies born with Down Syndrome every year. That equates to 300,000 for the past 50 years. There are 3,500,000 (more than 3 million more) people living with autism in the US. And might I say, autism is more serious than Down Syndrome in many cases. Who is going to take care of all the adults in diapers who are physically violent and can't communicate verbally or otherwise? Who is going to care for the adults who stim and bang their head all day? Who is going to take care of the adults who can't work because of sensory processing disorders? These children will never marry, never have grand babies for their parents to enjoy. And the numbers are growing, not decreasing.
With no known 'cause' of autism out there, don't you think it's about time someone with some common sense wrote about about How to End the Autism Epidemic, since science, the cdc and the government can't seem to do that? I think it's about damn time and please jump on the bandwagon to save our nation.
Thank you and have a good day. ;)
